[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 1/5: cmd_boot

[Robert Schwebel]

On Mon, Mar 31, 2003 at 02:31:56PM +0200, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> That does not mean that it doesn't show some weird behaviour.

Are you sure the weird behaviour comes from minicom? Or is it the
combination of minicom and some of it's backend programs? 

> Ummm... if there are better. working alternatives I feel  tempted  to
> ignore broken software.

I generally have no problem with using stone aged software, but for a
terminal program (which is also used by non-hackers) I prefer using
something with at least a _little_ bit of usability comfort (menues and
stuff). Unfortunately, there is no better thing than minicom around for
Linux...

> Really? I don't. And I don't recommend it. Instead,  I  recommend  to
> ignore  it.  I  see little advanteages. Use Ckermit - it is much more
> flexible, it works, and it it available for a  plethora  of  systems,
> not only Linux.

People use it, so it should be supported. Other question: does my patch
do any harm to your ckermit? If not, what's the problem? 

Robert
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Braunschweiger Str. 79,  31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
    Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-28619-4