[U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC for AT91RM9200

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <41A36CFE.9050900 at imc-berlin.de> you wrote:
> 
> Hmm. So I suggest replacing it with CONFIG_INIT_LOWLEVEL or CONFIG_LOWLEVEL_INIT.

Hmmm.. CONFIG or CFG? And what exactly is low (vs. high?) level here?

> But then: these init steps (clocks and memory) are vital for U-Boot to run. So 
> why do we need this define anyway if these steps should be done always... ?

Good question. The only reason I can think of  is  to  allob  such  a
two-stage boot loader as used by Atmel on the AT91RM9200DK.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
There's no sense in being precise  when  you  don't  even  know  what
you're talking about.                             -- John von Neumann