[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Define upmconfig() for 834x systems
wd at denx.de
Mon Sep 11 20:52:12 CEST 2006
in message <4505A28B.9010909 at freescale.com> you wrote:
> I think that's just going to make more work for Wolfgang and not
> solve any real problems. Patches aren't completely independent of
Oh well, it does. Actually this is what I'm doing all the time
internally. I just need to decide (a) if I want to make such branches
publickly available in general (versus in special cases as we already
do with the USB and NAND testing branches), (b) what's the most
efficient way for me is to deal with such a configuration, and (c)
what could be done to get more feedback about test results from board
> each other - sooner or later he's going to get patches that apply to
> one tree but not the other.
> Anyone who's really interested in unapplied patches can scan the mailing list archives.
Umm... I disagree. Having the patches available in a git repo where
you can pull and/or cherry-pick from is much more effcient than
having to deal with email messages, where patches come in a plethora
of different formats, often in many parts and sub-parts, or combinbed
as patches plus tarballs, or whatever.
IN theory, our patch tracking system should jump in here and allow
for easy scanning of open and applied patches, but again this takes
more time than planned.
I apologize for this.
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
To know how another being, another creature feels - that is impos-
sible. - Terry Pratchett, _The Dark Side of the Sun_
More information about the U-Boot