[U-Boot-Users] [ARM] TI DaVinci support, 2nd attempt [0/5]
Dirk Behme
dirk.behme at googlemail.com
Tue Aug 7 19:04:19 CEST 2007
ksi at koi8.net wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sergey Kubushyn <ksi at koi8.net>
>
> Here it is.
>
> Changes:
>
> - Split into separate board directories
> - Removed changes to MTD_DEBUG (or whatever it's called)
> - New CONFIG_CMD party line followed
> - Some cosmetic fixes, cleanup etc.
> - Patches against the latest U-Boot tree as of now.
Many thanks!
> Unfortunately it won't compile because of that BIOS emulator or what it
> is...
I just sent a hackish patch to be able to at least compile.
With this, some comments to your recent patches:
1) As with your first set of patches, I can't get patch 2/5 and 4/5
get apply cleanly. I get rejects needing manual resolve for everything
modifying already existing files. All files/patches adding new files
apply cleanly.
2) The net files don't compile because they need new style config option
#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_NET) ...
3) Schmoogie config needs a #undef CONFIG_CMD_EEPROM instead of a #define
4) With schmoogie config, schmoogie/dv_board.c fails linking because
of missing forceenv(). E.g. in exports.h this is clamped by #ifdef
CONFIG_HAS_UID. So I think misc_init_r() in all three dv_board.c need
anything similiar.
I will send my updated versions of your patches for reference as
answers to the individual patch mails. No, I don't want to steal
anything. I want to help. They resolve 1) - 3), so only (4) is open.
Feel free to send them again with your Signed-off-by, to ignore them,
or use them for update. You mentioned that you are short of time, so
hopefully we can avoid to invent the wheel two times and reuse stuff
already fixed.
For me, then everything else looks okay ;) So I think resolving (4)
will be the hopefully final version then.
Best regards
Dirk
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list