[U-Boot] [PATCH] Consolidate strmhz() implementation

[Haavard Skinnemoen]

Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj at jcrosoft.com> wrote:
> I've seen 2 others functions which are commom.
> 
> Could we use the patch that reply to this message instead?

The only downside that I can think of is that configuration that truly
don't require strmhz() and don't use --gc-sections will end up slightly
larger.

All the configurations I care about use --gc-sections, so it's fine
with me.

Haavard