[U-Boot] OMAP3: Pending patches

[Premi, Sanjeev]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dirk Behme [mailto:dirk.behme at googlemail.com] 
> Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2009 11:05 AM
> To: U-Boot user list; Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD; 
> Premi, Sanjeev; Tom Rix
> Cc: Wolfgang Denk
> Subject: Re: OMAP3: Pending patches
> 
> 
> Short status update after scanning the recent mails:
> 
> Dirk Behme wrote:
> > 
> > To avoid loosing the overview, here my list of pending 
> OMAP3 patches 
> > ready to be applied. From my point of view there are no 
> open comments on 
> > these which will prevent to apply them. But please correct if I 
> > overlooked anything or add what (patches? comments?) I missed.
> > 
> > 1. OMAP3: Beagle: Set pinmux conditionally for Rev C boards
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051013.html
> > 
> > 2. OMAP3: Remove legacy NAND defines
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050882.html
> > 
> > 3. OMAP3: Fix timer handling to 1ms and CONFIG_SYS_HZ to 1000
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051178.html
> > 
> > 4. OMAP3: Fix changed mmc init command
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051179.html
> > 
> > 5. OMAP3: Remove unused board-types
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051338.html
> 
> We will try to switch to
> 
> print_cpuinfo & checkboard
> 
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051365.html
> 
> Premi: Do you like to have a look? Hopefully it wouldn't be too hard.

[SP] Sure, I will...

> 
> Jean-Christophe: Please fix the "test-only" and add the documentation 
> as requested by Wolfgang as soon as possible, that we can 
> safely use it.
> 
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051382.html
> 
> > 6. OMAP3: Print correct silicon revision
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051339.html
> > 
> > 7. Zoom2 respin II (10 patches)
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050863.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050864.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050865.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050866.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050868.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050867.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050869.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050870.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050871.html
> > http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/050872.html
> 
> After
> 
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051383.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051384.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051385.html
> http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2009-April/051386.html
> 
> Tom has to check if an update of this series is necessary.
> 
> > Note: There might be some dependencies between some of 
> these patches. 
> > Different authors, sent at different time, unfortunately 
> this can't be 
> > avoided. So dependent on the order the patches will be 
> applied, there 
> > might be some conflicts. Let us know them, we will try to 
> update/fix 
> > then as soon as possible! Most probably 5. and 7. will have some 
> > conflicts, as 5. removes some code 7. assumes it is still 
> there. If this 
> > results in a conflict, let us apply the 10 patches from 7. 
> first and 
> > then update 5.
> 
> Jean-Christophe: If series 7. needs an update, it would be really 
> helpful if you could apply the other patches so that updated 
> 7. can be 
> rebased against them. This will reduce the risk of conflicts.
> 
> Dirk
> 
>