[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 2/6] Move lib_<ARCH> directories to lib/<ARCH>

[Peter Tyser]

On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 15:42 -0600, Scott Wood wrote:
> Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > Dear Peter Tyser,
> > 
> > In message <1258943983.9357.20.camel at ptyser-laptop> you wrote:
> >> My personal preference would be to take it a step further and organize
> >> like:
> >>
> >> /arch/$ARCH/
> >> 	/lib/<sources currently in lib_$ARCH/>
> >> 	/include/asm/<headers currently in incluce/asm-$ARCH/>
> >> 	/cpu/<appropriate cpu directories in cpu/>
> >> 	/config.mk (old lib_$ARCH/config.mk)
> >>
> >> /lib/
> >>         /<source files currently in lib_generic>
> >>         /libfdt/
> >>         /lzma/
> >>         /lzo/
> >>
> >> This layout would more closely match the Linux layout and is cleaner
> >> overall in my opinion.  What do others think of this idea?
> > 
> > I generally agree with the idea, with the exception of
> > /include/asm/<headers> - I really hate this change in the Linux
> > kernel, and still fail to see any advantages of this.
> 
> I really like only having one subtree to grep for arch stuff, and it 
> would avoid presenting files that are in git, under a path that git 
> doesn't know about.
> 
> Plus, the symlink is one less thing that the makefiles would need to 
> keep in sync when arch changes.

I agree with Scott, especially the point about grepping for arch stuff
in one directory.  It also seems like a generally logical separation of
arch-specific code/headers.

What is the downside of splitting out the headers to arch/ directories?
Or the advantage of keeping them in include/asm-<arch>?

Best,
Peter