[U-Boot] [PATCH v6 4/6] arm, da850evm: Add an SPL for SPI boot

Christian Riesch christian.riesch at omicron.at
Wed Dec 14 20:09:08 CET 2011


Hi,

On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Tom Rini <tom.rini at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:33 PM, Christian Riesch
> <christian.riesch at omicron.at> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Friday, December 9, 2011, Christian Riesch <
christian.riesch at omicron.at>
>> wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Christian Riesch <christian.riesch at omicron.at>
>>> Cc: Heiko Schocher <hs at denx.de>
>>> Cc: Sandeep Paulraj <s-paulraj at ti.com>
>>> Cc: Tom Rini <trini at ti.com>
>>> Cc: Sudhakar Rajashekhara <sudhakar.raj at ti.com>
>>> ---
>>>  board/davinci/da8xxevm/da850evm.c     |    4 +-
>>>  board/davinci/da8xxevm/u-boot-spl.lds |   73
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  doc/README.davinci                    |    9 +++
>>>  include/configs/da850evm.h            |   87
>> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>  4 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>>>  create mode 100644 board/davinci/da8xxevm/u-boot-spl.lds
>>
>> Thanks for merging this into ti/next, Tom!
>>
>> I'd like to submit a similar patch for the da850_am18xxevm board. Before
>> commit 06194b6b65f701a9d6ef2d9b4123c4afe57d8783 both the da850evm and the
>> da850_am18xxevm used the same configuration, and the differences
introduced
>> in the commit are rather small. Should I submit a patch that adds the
same
>> SPL configuration to the am18xx board config? Or should we create a
header
>> file that contains the common parts and include it in both da850evm.h and
>> da850_am18xxevm.h? Or shall we use the Options column in boards.cfg?
>
> I'd like it if you submitted a patch for both boards.  On my TODO list
> is seeing about cleaning up some of the config files for non-omap4/5
> (which have a common.h file they start with) in 2012.03.

Ok, I'll try to provide a patch for da850_am18xxevm.h, but currently I
can't get it running:

I applied the changes that I did in include/configs/da850evm.h before to
da850_am18xxevm.h as well. I expected this to work on my board since the
board I used to test the SPI flash SPL patchset for the da850evm was
actually an AM1808 experimenter's kit.

Now my SPL reports:

SF: Unsupported manufacturer 20
failed.

Manufacturer 0x20 seems to be ST and the main difference between da850evm.h
and da850_am18xxevm.h is the missing #define CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_STMICRO in
da850_am18xxevm.h.

So my question is: Which boards are supported by da850_am18xxevm.h? I
thought that I probably have an old revision of the board, but I couldn't
find anything regarding SPI flash in LogicPD's PCNs.

Thanks for your help!
Christian


More information about the U-Boot mailing list