[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 22/22] omap: spl: add more debug traces

[Aneesh V]

Dear Wolfgang,

On Wednesday 15 June 2011 03:48 PM, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Dear Aneesh V,
>

[snip ..]

>> No. That wouldn't serve the purpose. I need two macros to distinguish
>> between the two cases.
>> 1. 'debug()' - can be used in all places at which console is guaranteed
>> to be initialized whether executed as part of U-Boot or SPL.
>> 2. 'spl_debug()' to be used at places where console is initialized for
>> SPL but not for U-Boot (eg. lowlevel_init()) - so emit no code for
>> U-Boot.
>
> You see - this distinction is becoming a mess.  Let's get rid of this
> and use common code for both cases.

I replaced spl_debug() with debug() now. I moved sdram_init() out of
lowlevel_init() for u-boot so that console is available by the time
sdram_init() runs.

However, clock init needs to remain in lowlevel_init() and I still feel
that some debug traces from this module will be a good debugging tool
for SPL, so I retained the traces and added something like this in
arch/arm/cpu/armv7/omap4/clocks.c:


/*
  * printing to console doesn't work unless
  * this code is executed from SPL
  */
#ifndef CONFIG_PRELOADER
#define printf(fmt, args...)
#define puts(s)
#endif

Is that fine?

best regards,
Aneesh