[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/2] Introduce generic TPM support in u-boot

[Vadim Bendebury]

Dear Wolfgang Denk,

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 1:53 PM, Wolfgang Denk <wd at denx.de> wrote:
> Dear Vadim Bendebury,
>
> In message <CANy1buJ0mhpDY948c+PM6u4EsWtoHw3+-u+m_FNiG3BztBinVA at mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
>>
>> because this chip is sensitive to the access cycle size (byte versus word).
>>
>> When using macros one can rely on the passed in pointer type to decide
>> which access to use (byte vs word). If using inline functions, there
>> would be two separate functions required for read (byte and u32) and
>> write (byte and u32).
>
> This would then be an improvement in the code, as we then can see
> what the code is actually doing.
>

please see the latest patch (v5) which addresses the chip
representation and register access wrapper comments.

cheers,
/vb

> Best regards,
>
> Wolfgang Denk
>
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH,     MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
> What the gods would destroy they first submit to  an  IEEE  standards
> committee.
>