[U-Boot] [PATCH v9 0/4] Kirkwood: add lschlv2 and lsxhl board support

Prafulla Wadaskar prafulla at marvell.com
Wed Jun 6 13:26:40 CEST 2012



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael Walle [mailto:michael at walle.cc]
> Sent: 06 June 2012 12:39
> To: Joe Hershberger
> Cc: Prafulla Wadaskar; u-boot at lists.denx.de
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v9 0/4] Kirkwood: add lschlv2 and lsxhl
> board support
> 
> 
> 
> Joe Hershberger <joe.hershberger at gmail.com> schrieb:
> 
> >Hi Prafulla,
> >
> >On Tue, Jun 5, 2012 at 4:36 PM, Michael Walle <michael at walle.cc>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Prafulla,
> >>
> >> Am Dienstag 05 Juni 2012, 23:33:13 schrieb Michael Walle:
> >>> Changes:
> >>> v9:
> >>>  - rebase to marvell custodian tree, merged with wolfgangs master
> >> [..snip..]
> >>
> >>
> >> I had to merge your tree with wolfgangs master, because my second
> net
> >patch
> >> depends on the latest net patches by Joe.
> >>
> >> So please make sure you merge wolfgangs master with your tree
> before
> >applying
> >> these patches.

u-boot-marvell.git is cloned from u-boot-arm.git, and I always sync with this before any task. And just to keep it clean for pull requests I would not like to pull any other repository in it.

Copying Albert on this, who can sync u-boot.git into u-boot-arm.git if something is missing.

Regards..
Prafulla . . .

> >
> >It seems a better way to handle this is to rebase marvell onto WD's
> >master and push that to the marvell tree, allowing Michael to rebase
> >his patches onto that version.  It seems there should not be a merge
> >here.
> 
> that should work too. but my patcheset v9 should apply cleanly
> regardless of which way you choose.
> 
> michael
> 
> 



More information about the U-Boot mailing list