[U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] ehci-hcd.c: Add a new USB_DMA_MINALIGN define for cache alignment

[Tom Rini]

On 06/14/2012 12:41 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> Dear Tom Rini,
> 
>> On 06/14/2012 12:29 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>>> Dear Tom Rini,
>>>
>>>> The USB spec says that 32 bytes is the minimum required alignment.
>>>> However on some platforms we have a larger minimum requirement for cache
>>>> coherency.  In those cases, use that value rather than the USB spec
>>>> minimum.
>>>>
>>>> Cc: Marek Vasut <marex at denx.de>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <trini at ti.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>
>>>>  drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c |   23 +++++++++++++++++------
>>>>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>>>> index 04300be..45725f5 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c
>>>> @@ -29,12 +29,23 @@
>>>>
>>>>  #include "ehci.h"
>>>>
>>>> -int rootdev;
>>>> -struct ehci_hccr *hccr;	/* R/O registers, not need for volatile */
>>>> -volatile struct ehci_hcor *hcor;
>>>> +/*
>>>> + * The EHCI spec says that we must align to at least 32 bytes. 
>>>> However, + * some platforms require larger alignment.
>>>> + */
>>>> +#if ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN > 32
>>>> +#define USB_DMA_MINALIGN	ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN
>>>> +#else
>>>> +#define USB_DMA_MINALIGN	32
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> Don't we have some common header for these?
>>
>> For ECHI and musb?  I did not spot one unless we go all the way up to
>> common.h or similar.
> 
> Ok, that's crappy :-/
> 
> Don't we have ehci.h or usb.h? Is musb ehci or not?

MUSB is Mentor USB.  But, good spotting, include/usb.h is in both
ehci-hcd.c (and other places) and musb_core.h, moving there.

-- 
Tom