[U-Boot] [PULL] u-boot-pxa / fix

Albert ARIBAUD albert.u.boot at aribaud.net
Thu Mar 1 23:05:16 CET 2012


Hi Marek,

Le 29/02/2012 22:38, Marek Vasut a écrit :
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> Le 27/02/2012 21:53, Marek Vasut a écrit :
>>>> Hi Marek,
>>>>
>>>> Le 27/02/2012 14:03, Marek Vasut a écrit :
>>>>> The following changes since commit
> 417c2c787e32784b5de975065a7d1dd5b3cc8ecd:
>>>>>      at91: modified NAND flash timing on otc570 board (2012-02-20
>>>>>      09:00:13 +0100)
>>>>>
>>>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>>>      git://git.denx.de/u-boot-pxa.git fix
>>>>>
>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to 2e85d5c10f01b21ac47f9b0dd4a9dcc022ac0be6:
>>>>>      PXA: Fix missing get_tbclk() breaking vpac boards (2012-02-27
>>>>>      13:59:47 +0100)
>>>>>
>>>>> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Marek Vasut (3):
>>>>>          PXA: Remove PXA PCMCIA support
>>>>>          PXA: Fix warning in zipitz2
>>>>>          PXA: Fix missing get_tbclk() breaking vpac boards
>>>>>
>>>>> Simon Glass (1):
>>>>>          arm: Remove jornada link script
>>>>>
>>>>> Vasily Khoruzhick (2):
>>>>>          zipitz2: fix boot issue introduced by PXA low level init rework
>>>>>          zipitz2: use pxa_mmc_gen as MMC driver
>>>>>
>>>>>     arch/arm/cpu/pxa/timer.c    |    5 ++
>>>>>     board/jornada/u-boot.lds    |   58 ---------------------------
>>>>>     board/zipitz2/zipitz2.c     |    9 ++++
>>>>>     doc/README.PXA_CF           |   56 --------------------------
>>>>>     drivers/pcmcia/Makefile     |    1 -
>>>>>     drivers/pcmcia/pxa_pcmcia.c |   93
>>>>>     -------------------------------------------
>>>>>     include/configs/zipitz2.h
>>>>>
>>>>>      |   14 +++++-
>>>>>
>>>>>     include/pcmcia.h            |    3 +-
>>>>>     8 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 213 deletions(-)
>>>>>     delete mode 100644 board/jornada/u-boot.lds
>>>>>     delete mode 100644 doc/README.PXA_CF
>>>>>     delete mode 100644 drivers/pcmcia/pxa_pcmcia.c
>>>>
>>>> Is there a reason why this pull request is on a "fix" branch, not
>>>> "master"?
>>>>
>>>> Amicalement,
>>>
>>> Since those are mostly fixes.
>>
>> My meaning was, if they are fixes, then why are they not on
>> u-boot-pxa/master as they should be?
>
> Because I'm an evil maintainer that is very happy if he can bring in
> inconsistency ! I'll put it into master next time.

Please meet the evil arch-custodian that is very happy if he can impose 
order. :)

More seriously though: do you mean you are going to move these commits 
to master and send an updated pull req, or should take this one as being 
master?

> Cheers!
> M

Amicalement,
-- 
Albert.


More information about the U-Boot mailing list