[U-Boot] [PATCH v4] usb: align buffers at cacheline

[Mike Frysinger]

On Friday 02 March 2012 11:45:15 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> > > That's what I did in original patch where I am aligning it by adding
> > > the line
> > > 
> > > +        /* Device Descriptor */
> > > +#ifdef ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN
> > > +       struct usb_device_descriptor descriptor
> > > +               __attribute__((aligned(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN)));
> > > +#else
> > > +       struct usb_device_descriptor descriptor;
> > > +#endif
> > > 
> > > in usb.h Line:112
> > > 
> > > > M
> > 
> > I see ...and I told you it's wrong? I must have misunderstood, I'm sorry
> > about that. But if you actually do this, you can avoid memcpy, right?
> 
> And eventually wd can also avoid the #ifdef ?  I guess the
> __attribute__((aligned...)) would not hurt anything?

the reason i disliked that was because it adds padding to the structure.  on 
my system, seems to go from 144 bytes to 160, and the other goes from 1352 to 
1376.  the scsi structure isn't specific to usb either.  i can't tell if this 
is a structure that represents data on the wire ... the fact it's written all 
using char types makes me suspicious.  if it is, then obviously we can't 
change the padding in the struct.

further, it doesn't seem like Linux imposes this restriction at the structure 
level (does it do memcopies instead ?), and imposing it on arbitrary members 
in there w/out documentation easily leads to rot.  if the code changes and no 
longer needs this alignment, how do we tell ?  if the code starts transferring 
another structure, do we end up aligning every member in there until there's 
padding everywhere ?
-mike
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20120305/514a73d8/attachment.pgp>