[U-Boot] Patch sets coming

[York Sun]

On 03/22/2013 02:25 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 10:17:03PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
>> Dear York Sun,
>>
>> In message <514CC7B1.2070706 at freescale.com> you wrote:
>>>
>>> Will fix. I often found unsure about some warnings, not knowing if
>>> u-boot follow exactly the same standard. Beside, some old patches may
>>> pass checkpatch then but fails today.
>>
>> Well, you are supposed to run checkpatch _today_, before posting, and
>> fix such issues.
>>
>> There may be a few cases where you intentionally ignore such fixes
>> (like lines over 80 characters in tables of pin-muxc initializations,
>> where wrapping the code would make it even worse to read), but such
>> exceptions and your reasoning should be metioned in the comments.
> 
> To be clear, I know of 2 cases checkpatch.pl gets wrong today and I have
> patches for both to push to correct this:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/228173/
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/227717/
> 
> Aside from that, it's once again checkpatch is correct unless obviously
> wrong (first patch for example) and we should fix .checkpatch.conf so it
> stops being wrong.
> 

Thanks, Tom. I was using checkpatch from linux. Will use
tools/checkpatch.pl from now on.

York