[U-Boot] [PATCH] arm: ls102xa: Enable snooping for CCI-400 S0 slave interface

[York Sun]

Alison,

On 11/13/2014 06:12 AM, Alison Wang wrote:
> CAAM is connected to CCI-400 S0 slave interface. Disable snooping for
> S0 will cause CAAM self test failure. This patch is to enable snooping
> for S0 slave interface.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alison Wang <alison.wang at freescale.com>
> ---
>  board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c | 3 +--
>  board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c | 3 +--
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c b/board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c
> index 4dda5e3..e5dea5d 100644
> --- a/board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c
> +++ b/board/freescale/ls1021aqds/ls1021aqds.c
> @@ -202,10 +202,9 @@ int board_early_init_f(void)
>  		 CCI400_DVM_MESSAGE_REQ_EN | CCI400_SNOOP_REQ_EN);
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Set CCI-400 Slave interface S0, S1, S2 Shareable Override Register
> +	 * Set CCI-400 Slave interface S1, S2 Shareable Override Register
>  	 * All transactions are treated as non-shareable
>  	 */
> -	out_le32(&cci->slave[0].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
>  	out_le32(&cci->slave[1].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
>  	out_le32(&cci->slave[2].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
>  
> diff --git a/board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c b/board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c
> index 0629d1c..2c8afc0 100644
> --- a/board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c
> +++ b/board/freescale/ls1021atwr/ls1021atwr.c
> @@ -419,10 +419,9 @@ int board_init(void)
>  	struct ccsr_cci400 *cci = (struct ccsr_cci400 *)CONFIG_SYS_CCI400_ADDR;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Set CCI-400 Slave interface S0, S1, S2 Shareable Override Register
> +	 * Set CCI-400 Slave interface S1, S2 Shareable Override Register
>  	 * All transactions are treated as non-shareable
>  	 */
> -	out_le32(&cci->slave[0].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
>  	out_le32(&cci->slave[1].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
>  	out_le32(&cci->slave[2].sha_ord, CCI400_SHAORD_NON_SHAREABLE);
>  	out_le32(0x1185000, 0x3);
> 

Which patch does this one depend on? The code you remove doesn't exist. Please
check and rebase to latest code if necessary.

York