[U-Boot] [PATCH] RFC: Secure boot to U-Boot proper from SPL

Simon Glass sjg at chromium.org
Thu May 19 05:59:41 CEST 2016


Hi Teddy,

On 8 May 2016 at 19:13, Teddy Reed <teddy.reed at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:12 AM, Teddy Reed <teddy.reed at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've been using the following patch for my configurations, please excuse the top-posting. I think the only difference is enabling the uclass mod_exp driver to initialize without needing relocation.
>>
>
> If no one has any additional notes / requirements for enablement in
> SPL I can send my tiny bit of configuration changes as a patch.
>
> I've tested the DM flag change for the RSA mod_exp driver class for
> both relocated (u-boot) and non-relocated (SPL) builds and found no
> issues. It would be awesome to get another set of eyes on the Makefile
> feature reorganization as I don't want this to include unneeded code
> into SPLs. :)

Sounds good, a few patches would be useful.

Regards,
Simon


More information about the U-Boot mailing list