[PATCH 0/5] Fix i.MXRT1050 hang on lcdif init and improve DT for mxsfb

Giulio Benetti giulio.benetti at benettiengineering.com
Thu May 13 12:26:44 CEST 2021


Hi Stefano,

On 5/13/21 10:14 AM, Stefano Babic wrote:
> Hi Giulio,
> 
> On 13.05.21 00:12, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>> Hi Stefano,
>>
>> On 5/2/21 1:44 AM, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>>> On 4/13/21 1:05 AM, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>>>> On 4/13/21 1:03 AM, Giulio Benetti wrote:
>>>>> This patchset fixes u-boot hang on i.MXRT1050 while setting lcdif in
>>>>> mxsfb
>>>>> driver. There are 2 gates to be enabled to initialize mxsfb so let's
>>>>> introduce the missing gate as a clock and rename "per" clock to
>>>>> "pix" clock
>>>>> since in the other .dts files using *-lcdif "pix" is used.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patchset add also "disp_axi" clock enabling in mxsfb that
>>>>> should make
>>>>> able to every i.MX SoC with lcdif using DT. I didn't test it other than
>>>>> i.MXRT1050 since I don't have the boards. If someone can test it it
>>>>> would
>>>>> be great. Note that i.MX23/28 should fail using DT instead because they
>>>>> don't specify any clock-names in their dts.
>>>>
>>>> I've forgotten to specify that this patchset depends on this patchset:
>>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=237909
>>>
>>> This ^^^ series is superseeded by v2:
>>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=241701
>>
>> Current patchset is not superseeded, only the one which depends to is
>> superseeded by v2. Do you prefer me to send a unique patchset with all
>> patches of both patchsets?
> 
> Yes, or in patchset becomes a mess. Please send a complete series, thanks !

Well I've merged in a unique patchset both patchsets[1], sorry for my 
e-mail mess.

[1]: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=243591

Best regards
-- 
Giulio Benetti
Benetti Engineering sas


More information about the U-Boot mailing list