[PATCH v2 0/9] Add DT USB definitions for SAM9X60, SAMA5D2 and SAMA7

[Marek Vasut]

On 1/4/23 09:09, Eugen.Hristev at microchip.com wrote:
> On 1/3/23 17:35, Sergiu Moga wrote:
>> This patch series originates from the bigger patch series:
>> https://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/2022-December/502865.html
>>
>> Add the basic DT USB definitions for SAM9X60, SAMA5D2 and SAMA7. The
>> required pinctrl definitions have been added as well as additional
>> definitions for the UTMI related clocks and their relationship with the
>> Reset driver.
>>
>> v1 -> v2:
>> - split patches for SoC/Board separately
>> - use usb@
>>
>> Sergiu Moga (9):
>>     ARM: dts: sam9x60: Add OHCI and EHCI DT nodes
>>     ARM: dts: sam9x60_curiosity: Add pinctrl and gpio properties for USB
>>     ARM: dts: sam9x60ek: Add pinctrl and gpio properties for USB
>>     dt-bindings: reset: add sama7g5 definitions
>>     dt-bindings: clk: at91: Define additional UTMI related clocks
>>     ARM: dts: sama7g5: Add USB and UTMI DT nodes
>>     ARM: dts: sama7g5ek: Add pinctrl, gpio and phy properties for USB
>>     ARM: dts: sama5d2_icp: Add pinctrl nodes for USB related DT nodes
>>     ARM: dts: sama5d27_wlsom1_ek: Add pinctrl nodes for USB DT nodes
>>
>>    arch/arm/dts/at91-sam9x60_curiosity.dts   | 21 +++++++
>>    arch/arm/dts/at91-sama5d27_wlsom1_ek.dts  | 25 ++++++++
>>    arch/arm/dts/at91-sama5d2_icp.dts         | 22 +++++++
>>    arch/arm/dts/at91-sama7g5ek.dts           | 34 +++++++++++
>>    arch/arm/dts/sam9x60.dtsi                 | 18 ++++++
>>    arch/arm/dts/sam9x60ek.dts                | 21 +++++++
>>    arch/arm/dts/sama7g5.dtsi                 | 73 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>    include/dt-bindings/clk/at91.h            |  5 ++
>>    include/dt-bindings/reset/sama7g5-reset.h | 10 ++++
>>    9 files changed, 229 insertions(+)
>>    create mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/reset/sama7g5-reset.h
>>
> 
> 
> Hi Marek,
> 
> If you have nothing against it, I will take the DTs through at91 tree
> now, as I am preparing my PR for 2023.04 .
> As DT is ABI and this series is on the list for a while now, I see no
> reason to delay it.
> Are you fine with that ?

I am hoping for a V3 with feedback on V1 and V2 addressed .