<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; charset=iso-8859-1">
<META NAME="Generator" CONTENT="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7652.24">
<TITLE>RE: [U-Boot-Users] [ARM] TI DaVinci support, 2nd attempt [0/5]</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<P><FONT SIZE=2>It is crappy and broken... I was just being nice :) I'm tired of fighting problems that we would have never seen if we were using a somewhat more modern u-boot...<BR>
<BR>
Thanks,<BR>
Zach<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
-----Original Message-----<BR>
From: ksi@koi8.net [<A HREF="mailto:ksi@koi8.net">mailto:ksi@koi8.net</A>]<BR>
Sent: Mon 8/6/2007 11:43 PM<BR>
To: Zach Sadecki<BR>
Cc: U-Boot list<BR>
Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [ARM] TI DaVinci support, 2nd attempt [0/5]<BR>
<BR>
On Mon, 6 Aug 2007, Zach Sadecki wrote:<BR>
<BR>
><BR>
> Sergey,<BR>
> You mentioned in a previous post that you had a serial boot utility<BR>
> you wrote to get away from the C# one that TI has... Did you write that<BR>
> in C? Could you share it with the list, since it would be most helpful<BR>
> to those of us who work with Davinci boards.<BR>
<BR>
It is partially in C and partially in Assembly. I would like to share it but<BR>
it is quite messy right now, code requires a good cleanup. Unfortunately I<BR>
don't have time right now, I'm extremely busy with bringing up prototype<BR>
boards that just came in... We're very short in time so I have to get them<BR>
up and running asap and give out a list of required changes and fixes for<BR>
the final prototypes and then go into production...<BR>
<BR>
So I will do it later, when that pressure is somehow lessened...<BR>
<BR>
Another thing is I don't know where it belongs. Just posting it to the list<BR>
will do little good, it must go into some repository or a product. I think<BR>
it would be OK to add various bootloaders to the U-Boot tree so people would<BR>
have all the means for bringing up their hardware from totally virgin state<BR>
but that requires cooperation, willinness to add yet another tree to the<BR>
U-Boot and decision on where it should go...<BR>
<BR>
> Thanks for all your efforts with this port of u-boot. It will be great<BR>
> to be able to move up to a clean, well written version. I look forward<BR>
> to the NAND support especially, since the stuff in the TI supplied<BR>
> u-boot is almost 3 years old...<BR>
<BR>
It is not just old, it is crappy and non-working :) And their I2C stuff is<BR>
absolutely bogus...<BR>
<BR>
---<BR>
******************************************************************<BR>
* KSI@home KOI8 Net < > The impossible we do immediately. *<BR>
* Las Vegas NV, USA < > Miracles require 24-hour notice. *<BR>
******************************************************************<BR>
<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>