[ANN] U-Boot v2022.04-rc1 released

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 09:47:52PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 12:31:46PM -0700, Simon Glass wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 12:29, Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 11, 2022 at 9:26 PM Simon Glass <sjg at chromium.org> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 11 Feb 2022 at 11:28, Andy Shevchenko
> > > > <andriy.shevchenko at intel.com> wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 05:59:30PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > > FWIW here is my tboot flash script for Edison:
> > >
> > > This is rather unbriking script, DFU (luckily) works
> > 
> > Not if it is bricked: :-) I need something that always works.
> > 
> > >
> > > >     def flash_edison(self, repo):
> > > >         vid = 0x8086
> > > >         pid = 0xe005
> > > >         expect = "%04x:%04x" % (vid, pid)
> > > >         self.wait_for_dfu(expect)
> > > >         u_boot = os.path.join(repo._local_str(), "u-boot-edison.img")
> > > >         bindir = self.usbboot_xfstk_dir
> > > >         self.host.exec0(
> > > >             "xfstk-dldr-solo", "--gpflags", "0x80000007",
> > > >             "--osimage", u_boot,
> > > >             "--fwdnx", os.path.join(bindir, "edison_dnx_fwr.bin"),
> > > >             "--fwimage", os.path.join(bindir, "edison_ifwi-dbg-00.bin"),
> > > >             "--osdnx", os.path.join(bindir, "edison_dnx_osr.bin"))
> > >
> > > To the topic, any suggestions on how to fix the current U-Boot regression?
> > 
> > The easiest thing is to use 'acpi list' and 'acpi dump facp' etc. to
> > see what is different between the two commits. My testing was on coral
> > and minnowmax and I must have missed it. We don't actually have any
> > test coverage on the board-specific code.
> 
> => acpi dump facp
> Table 'FACP' not found
> 
> This explains I believe everything.

Side question(s):

- Why out of a sudden different name here:

    ACPI_WRITER(5fadt, "FACS", apl_write_fadt, 0);

  FACS vs FACP

- Why do you need double assignment of the same revision in acpi_fadt_common()

    header->revision = 4;
    ...
    /* Use ACPI 3.0 revision */
    fadt->header.revision = 4;



-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko