[PATCH v2 0/8] An effort to bring DT bindings compliance within U-Boot

Krzysztof Kozlowski krzysztof.kozlowski at linaro.org
Fri Dec 22 16:53:42 CET 2023

On 22/12/2023 16:45, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> I suppose we have to relay information to kernel sub-arch maintainers
>>> who aren't the same as maintaining U-Boot counterparts. How about
>>> adding U-Boot ML to CC for whichever DT change gets submitted in the
>> And every other project? Just setup lei filters.
>>> kernel? Otherwise adding U-Boot sub-arch maintainers as reviewers for
>>> corresponding kernel DT changes works too if that's acceptable.
>> You just entirely ignored my proposal without addressing it... ok let it
>> be. No, CC-ing U-boot maintainers changes nothing because as I said, I
>> want kernel maintainers and contributors to be aware.
> I don't think that adding U-Boot platform maintainers as reviewers for
> the platforms in the kernel is a terrible idea. Certainly kernel
> platform maintainers for which U-Boot platform maintainers are added to
> the MAINTAINERS entry will be aware. That said, something like your

The point is it does not solve my concern here. I did not express
problem that U-Boot maintainers are not aware. They can easily be aware
by setting simple lei filters.

The problem I want to solve is the kernel maintainers to be aware.

Best regards,

More information about the U-Boot-Custodians mailing list