[U-Boot-Users] SMC driver problem
robert at schwebel.de
Tue Apr 1 11:43:39 CEST 2003
On Tue, Apr 01, 2003 at 10:14:46AM +0200, Marius Groeger wrote:
> Have you looked at the assembly code generated by the compiler? Maybe
> the subroutine call enforces some instruction ordering, that otherwise
> doesn't take place.
> Guessing from your tests, timing doesn't seem to be the issue.
> Hm, stack operations don't seem to relate to the problem either.
> The D-Cache is still off, right?
> Does the problem persist, if you turn off the I-Cache?
No change; the icache enabling code in start.S is off anyway.
> Are there any instructions to enforce pending IO operation, such as
> the eieio on the PPC?
I don't think so.
> Just for clarification: by "the putx() function", you mean the puts("x");
> call, right? (probably slipped from s to x on your keyboard :-)
> I don't really understand this sentence. Could you explain this again,
I've done some further tests, the scenario looks like this now:
output character to serial port
(the critical line with the FIXME)
- if test1 and test2 are not present (commented out) it does not work.
- adding test2() and calling it makes it work
- adding test1() and _not_ alling it makes it break again when there are
more than 4 nops present. With 4 nops and less it still works.
All this looks like the positon of the code seems to be the problem, but why?
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Braunschweiger Str. 79, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4
More information about the U-Boot