[U-Boot-Users] uploading OS over network instead of u-boot do wnloading it from a server.
mvincent at systemem.com
mvincent at systemem.com
Fri Jun 27 23:01:03 CEST 2003
Hello Wolfgang, Charles. Sorry to jump in uninvited. I have been following
this list for a while and this topic is particularly important to me so I
thought I would add my 2 Pfennig's worth...
> > This whole discussion may not be appropriate on this list.
> I don't think so. It may be beneficial to many people, one way or
> another. To be honest, the idea of running a server on the target
> never even crossed my mind before. It is always a good thing to
> discuss alternative solutions - and if it's only to come to the
> conclusion that everything was done correctly :-)
Background: I designed a MPC8250 board with both WiFi and GPRS onboard (plus
serial, Ethernet and other goodies) and I am currently working on the
bootloader and OS ports. When I mentionned that I wanted to use U-Boot, I was
asked if it would be possible to upload new firmware/config/etc over the
wireless links. The expectation is that whoever is handling this update wants
to "push" it, ie. initiate it remotely (which is easier in our case
hardware is meant to be installed in vehicles).
My answer was that wireless links should be established only by the OS (Linux
kernel and utilities in this case), not by the KISS bootloader. But more
importantly, once you have a full OS running with spare memory and CPU cycles,
it should not be a problem to run the standard servers (telnet, ftp...) that
let you remotely manage anything that's on the filesystem, right? If security
is a concern (it is for us), you can again rely on open standards such as SSH
to secure your links.
My point is I like Wolfgang's approach: keep the U-Boot simple (uhmmmm, a bit
late for that! ;^) ), using standard protocols only, and primarily make it
serve the developpers well. Of course, some people have special requirements
(not enough flash...) that force them to boot from Ethernet, others may have a
problem with BOOTP/DHCP, and some may simply have a different perspective.
It's an open discussion.
For the record, I have done my fair share of proprietary protocols,
bootloaders and download utilities, and I don't care if I never have
the "chance" to do another one!
Heartfelt THANK YOU to all the contributors to U-Boot!
ps: I apologize if you received this twice. My first attempt bounced
on SF and I also goofed on the CC. I hate my mail setup...
More information about the U-Boot