[U-Boot-Users] I2C Initialization

Robert Schwebel r.schwebel at pengutronix.de
Thu Mar 6 09:40:06 CET 2003


On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:01:48AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> I don't understand the problem. i2c_init() is the first I2C related
> function that will be called on any system.
> 
> It is implemented in common/soft_i2c.c for the itbanging version  and
> in cpu/??/i2c.c and cpu/mpc824x/drivers/i2c/i2c1.c for the others.
> 
> 
> What prevents you from adding it there?
> 
> I don't want to add even more code to the init functions part.  Let's
> keep the stuff as local as possible.

Do we agree that i2c_init_board() has to be called right before (or at
the beginning of) i2c_init()? So we have the choice to either add the
call to all 12 cpu implementations or only once in the place right
before i2c_init() is called. Why make it cpu dependend when it is not? 

Robert 
-- 
 Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
 Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
   Braunschweiger Str. 79,  31134 Hildesheim, Germany
   Handelsregister:  Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
    Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 |  Fax: +49-5121-28619-4




More information about the U-Boot mailing list