[U-Boot-Users] I2C Initialization
Robert Schwebel
r.schwebel at pengutronix.de
Thu Mar 6 09:40:06 CET 2003
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 09:01:48AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> I don't understand the problem. i2c_init() is the first I2C related
> function that will be called on any system.
>
> It is implemented in common/soft_i2c.c for the itbanging version and
> in cpu/??/i2c.c and cpu/mpc824x/drivers/i2c/i2c1.c for the others.
>
>
> What prevents you from adding it there?
>
> I don't want to add even more code to the init functions part. Let's
> keep the stuff as local as possible.
Do we agree that i2c_init_board() has to be called right before (or at
the beginning of) i2c_init()? So we have the choice to either add the
call to all 12 cpu implementations or only once in the place right
before i2c_init() is called. Why make it cpu dependend when it is not?
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Braunschweiger Str. 79, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list