[U-Boot-Users] [RFD] Consistent debugging output structure
Robert Schwebel
r.schwebel at pengutronix.de
Mon Mar 24 09:59:22 CET 2003
On Mon, Mar 24, 2003 at 09:52:23AM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> I have answered this question before. I see no need for such a patch
> in the common code. You can easily implement it using the existing
> debug() macro if you feel you need it in your own code.
>
> I will reject such a patch if it globally effects all boards and all
> common code.
How could it affect other implementations if, additionally to the
existing debug() function, debug2() and debug3() are added? Sorry, but I
don't understand your arguments. I've never said that I wanted to change
the whole code at once.
Robert
--
Dipl.-Ing. Robert Schwebel | http://www.pengutronix.de
Pengutronix - Linux Solutions for Science and Industry
Braunschweiger Str. 79, 31134 Hildesheim, Germany
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686
Phone: +49-5121-28619-0 | Fax: +49-5121-28619-4
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list