[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 1/5: cmd_boot

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <20030331151712.GL7702 at pengutronix.de> you wrote:
>
> > Seriously, if you are running kermit to do the transfer using minicom, why 
> > bother with minicom?  Document for your users how to use kermit and make 
> > them type the commands -- menus aren't everything and minicom's menus are 
> > anything to write home about anyway.
> 
> Users may use Linux or Windows for their console machine, so the
> transfer protocol has to be machine independend and should be available
> out of the box on most of the machines out there. Which limits it to
> xmodem, zmodem and kermit. 

Don't forget S-Record. Actually most  people  I've  seen  working  on
windoze   boxen  preferred  S-Record  download  using  hyperterm  (or
whatever this tool was called).

> Folks, Linux is about having the choice. I like the user interface of
> minicom better than that one of a command line tool like ckermit. U-Boot
> shouldn't force people on one policy.

You write: "the transfer protocol has to be machine  independend  and
should  be  available  out  of  the  box  on most of the machines out
there".

Please name a terminal program that is available in  a  more  machine
independend way or on more machines out there than CKermit.


To me the only logical conclusion of your own arguments is  that  you
should be using CKermit.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
The software required `Windows 95 or better', so I installed Linux.