[U-Boot-Users] omap5910

Woodruff, Richard r-woodruff2 at ti.com
Thu Oct 30 21:41:02 CET 2003


I corresponded with a couple people who use bdi2000 on omap.  If you read
around on some news archives you will find them.  George Davis is one who
comes to mind.

Regards,

Richard W.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew S. McClintock [mailto:mattsm at arlut.utexas.edu] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:37 PM
> To: Woodruff, Richard
> Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
> 
> 
> Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development 
> board with Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch 
> to the BDI2000 I am used to debugging from with GNU tools on 
> Linux. Based on information from Albatron's web page there is 
> support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the BDI2000, I am curious if 
> anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?
> 
> Thanks,
> Matthew
> 
> On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:55, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > The 5910 for all practically purposes is the 1510.  I have 
> seen a doc 
> > somewhere, not sure if I captured it or not.
> > 
> > Basically, the difference is the way the parts are tested 
> and sorted.  
> > The 1510 parts are speed rated, and you can get up to a 
> 168MHx part.  
> > The 5910 parts are not and its only guaranteed up to 
> 150MHz, but its 
> > likely many will run at 168.  The 1510 also "claims" 
> support for some 
> > functionality which the 5910 will not admit to having.  The issue 
> > there is support and validation. 5910 parts will not be 
> validated for 
> > everything a 1510 will be.
> > 
> > I use a mix of both types of chips on development boards.  
> I use their 
> > u-boot images interchangeably....I have set my timings back 
> to 150MHz 
> > as the thing I've been working on will get parts stamped as 
> 5910 not 
> > 1510.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Richard W.
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > [mailto:u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf 
> > > Of Matthew S. McClintock
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:30 PM
> > > To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I
> > > understand its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does 
> > > anyone have any code or pointers to how the two cpu's are 
> different?
> > > 
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matthew
> > > 
> > > --
> > > Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm at arlut.utexas.edu>
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> > > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> > > help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> > > YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > U-Boot-Users mailing list
> > > U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does 
> > SourceForge.net help you be more productive?  Does it
> > help you create better code?   SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> > YOU!  Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ 
> > _______________________________________________
> > U-Boot-Users mailing list
> > U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> -- 
> Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm at arlut.utexas.edu>
> 
> 




More information about the U-Boot mailing list