[U-Boot-Users] omap5910
Woodruff, Richard
r-woodruff2 at ti.com
Thu Oct 30 21:41:02 CET 2003
I corresponded with a couple people who use bdi2000 on omap. If you read
around on some news archives you will find them. George Davis is one who
comes to mind.
Regards,
Richard W.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew S. McClintock [mailto:mattsm at arlut.utexas.edu]
> Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 2:37 PM
> To: Woodruff, Richard
> Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> Subject: RE: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
>
>
> Currently we are using the JTAG interface on our development
> board with Code Composer on Windows. I would like to switch
> to the BDI2000 I am used to debugging from with GNU tools on
> Linux. Based on information from Albatron's web page there is
> support for the ARM9TDMI cpu on the BDI2000, I am curious if
> anyone has a bdi2000 config for this cpu?
>
> Thanks,
> Matthew
>
> On Thu, 2003-10-30 at 13:55, Woodruff, Richard wrote:
> > The 5910 for all practically purposes is the 1510. I have
> seen a doc
> > somewhere, not sure if I captured it or not.
> >
> > Basically, the difference is the way the parts are tested
> and sorted.
> > The 1510 parts are speed rated, and you can get up to a
> 168MHx part.
> > The 5910 parts are not and its only guaranteed up to
> 150MHz, but its
> > likely many will run at 168. The 1510 also "claims"
> support for some
> > functionality which the 5910 will not admit to having. The issue
> > there is support and validation. 5910 parts will not be
> validated for
> > everything a 1510 will be.
> >
> > I use a mix of both types of chips on development boards.
> I use their
> > u-boot images interchangeably....I have set my timings back
> to 150MHz
> > as the thing I've been working on will get parts stamped as
> 5910 not
> > 1510.
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Richard W.
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > [mailto:u-boot-users-admin at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf
> > > Of Matthew S. McClintock
> > > Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 1:30 PM
> > > To: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > Subject: [U-Boot-Users] omap5910
> > >
> > >
> > > Has anyone done any work for the omap5910 cpu for u-boot? I
> > > understand its extremely similar to the omap1510 cpu. Does
> > > anyone have any code or pointers to how the two cpu's are
> different?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Matthew
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm at arlut.utexas.edu>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -------------------------------------------------------
> > > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
> > > Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
> > > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> > > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > U-Boot-Users mailing list
> > > U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> > >
> >
> >
> > -------------------------------------------------------
> > This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does
> > SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it
> > help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help
> > YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/
> > _______________________________________________
> > U-Boot-Users mailing list
> > U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users
> --
> Matthew S. McClintock <mattsm at arlut.utexas.edu>
>
>
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list