[U-Boot-Users] Re: nomen est omen: i.MX or mc9329 ?

[Steven Scholz]

llandre wrote:

> 
>> Stop - we have to differentiate between the "machine type" (which is
>> imx) and the _implementation_ (which could be something like M9328MXL)
>> and the "board" (M83281ADS).
>>
>> What about this:
>>
>>         "machine type" (arch/arm/mach-xxx in Linux nomenclature): imx
>>         "implementation" (asm/arm/arch-xxx/yyy.h): MC9328MXL
>>         "board": M83281ADS
> 
> 
> For me everything is ok but the board name. I never saw that name before.
> On my board I can read:
> 
> MOTOROLA
> M9328MX1ADS/M9328MXLADS
> Ver 2.0
> 
> Do you really have that name on your PCB?

Arhg!

I just noticed: While the chip is called MC9328MX1 the eval board has 
actually M9328MX1ADS printed on it (which is the order code). Note the 
missing 'C' ...

Steven