[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 16-bit NAND support

[Zhang, Jian]

Yes, it would change the code size as 16-bit nand code is added. But the
path that an 8-bit chip follows remains the same. I don't expect it
breaks any existing boards. Can someone run a test on 8-bit chip boards?

-Jian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: wd at denx.de [mailto:wd at denx.de]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 5:06 PM
> To: Zhang, Jian
> Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net; Johnson, Steve-OMAP
> Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] 16-bit NAND support
> 
> In message
<BA2832125C3C994384FCC051CDFC7369B8A34F at dlee2k05.ent.ti.com> you wrote:
> >
> > This is a patch to add 16-bit NAND support to u-boot. It doesn't
change
> > any existing 8-bit NAND code so it shouldn't affect any existing
boards
> > that have 8-bit chips. I tested it in 2 TI OMAP boards, one using
> 
> Did you actually _check_ if it has impact on exiting  boards?  Impact
> on parameters like code size, for example?
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk
> 
> --
> See us @ Embedded/Electronica Munich, Nov 09 - 12, Hall A.6 Booth 513
> Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
> "The one charm of marriage is that it makes a  life  of  deception  a
> neccessity."                                            - Oscar Wilde