[U-Boot-Users] CONFIG_BOOTBINFUNC for AT91RM9200

[Steven Scholz]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:

> In message <41A36CFE.9050900 at imc-berlin.de> you wrote:
> 
>>Hmm. So I suggest replacing it with CONFIG_INIT_LOWLEVEL or CONFIG_LOWLEVEL_INIT.
> 
> 
> Hmmm.. CONFIG or CFG? And what exactly is low (vs. high?) level here?
> 
> 
>>But then: these init steps (clocks and memory) are vital for U-Boot to run. So 
>>why do we need this define anyway if these steps should be done always... ?
> 
> 
> Good question. The only reason I can think of  is  to  allob  such  a
> two-stage boot loader as used by Atmel on the AT91RM9200DK.

So we check if all other arm920t boards have an implementation of memsetup(). 
Then kick out CONFIG_INIT_CRITICAL and introduce 
CONFIG_DO_NOT_MAKE_LOWLEVEL_INIT or something like that !? ;-)


-- 
Steven Scholz