[U-Boot-Users] Re: FW: Wind River SBC8560 Uboot support

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <FB3BAE941CB9B24782B2DE43D755BD89040CD818 at ala-mail02.wrs.com> you wrote:
> 
> In accordance with our last correspondence, I have made the following
> modifications to the attached patch, u-boot-1.1.1-Wr_SBC85xxPQ3.patch. This
> patch will upgrade u-boot-1.1.1 to support WindRiver's SBC8560/8540
> PowerQUICCIII board. 

Mostly added, thanks.

The parts NOT added are as follows:

diff -Naur ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/interrupts.c ./cpu/mpc85xx/interrupts.c
--- ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/interrupts.c	2003-10-15 19:53:51.000000000 -0400
+++ ./cpu/mpc85xx/interrupts.c	2004-08-27 13:01:50.000000000 -0400

None of the other existing 85xx boards needs functions  get_tbl()  or
set_tbl()  like  you  do.  Since interrupt handling is definitely not
board dependent I would like to understand why  you  think  you  need
this stuff while others can do without it.

diff -Naur ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.c ./cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.c
--- ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.c	2004-04-18 17:45:44.000000000 -0400
+++ ./cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.c	2004-08-30 12:04:30.000000000 -0400
...

diff -Naur ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.h ./cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.h
--- ../u-boot-1.1.1/cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.h	2004-04-18 17:45:44.000000000 -0400
+++ ./cpu/mpc85xx/tsec.h	2004-08-27 14:31:49.000000000 -0400
...


Patches don't apply against CVS tree. Please clean up your  code  and
resubmit new patch against top of tree in CVS.


diff -Naur ../u-boot-1.1.1/README ./README
--- ../u-boot-1.1.1/README	2004-04-23 16:32:05.000000000 -0400
+++ ./README	2004-08-27 13:11:30.000000000 -0400

Please resubmit and keep lists sorted!


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-4596-87  Fax: (+49)-8142-4596-88  Email: wd at denx.de
Nothing ever becomes real until it is experienced.       - John Keats