On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:12:28PM +0200, Tzachi Perelstein wrote: > Will it be ok to change it to [.b, .s, .w, .l] for 8, 16, 32, and 64? > If it is not acceptable what do you suggest? new cmd_mem64.c? other? I know I'm old-fashioned, but how about "[.b, .w, .l, .ll]"?