[U-Boot-Users] PPC970FX 64-bit processor

[Tolunay Orkun]

It would break compatibility with existing scripts and documentation of 
everyone else. I think we should maintain earlier definitions at least 
for existing 32-bit implementations.

Best regards,
Tolunay

John W. Linville wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 10, 2005 at 05:53:11PM +0200, tzachi perelstein wrote:
> 
> 
>>I can be even more explicitly and suggest [.8, .16, .32, .64].
>>What do you think?  
> 
> 
> I think I like that even better.
> 
> John
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues
> Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek.
> It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt
> _______________________________________________
> U-Boot-Users mailing list
> U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users