[U-Boot-Users] Does u-boot relocate absolute symbols?

Andreas Block andreas.block at esd-electronics.com
Fri Jul 1 10:01:08 CEST 2005

Rune: I'm sorry for the inconvenience, but I sent this mail to you instead  
of the U-Boot mailinglist.

And WD already slapped me for sending this example...

30.06.2005 18:54:40, "Rune Torgersen" <runet at innovsys.com> wrote:

> Wow.... This surprises me...
> I have alwayts thought that *test and test[] would be the same thing.
> Only solutionI can see is to change the definition in common.c to be
> *test, this will still get the address of test[] defined elsewhere.
> (See attached files)

Thanks, for your effort. Actually your suggestion is the way it's  
currently working
here, but as I described in my first post, I'm looking for a way, which  
leaves the
common code untouched. In my first post on 24.06.05 I've another solution,  
which is
working for Linux, but does not in U-Boot.


>> Sure, I've tried this. This is the point, where my problemarose.  
>> Attached you find twosmall files, you can easily compile under linux  
>> (gcc -oarrtest -I ./ ./common.c./array.c). The file "common.c"  
>> represents the code I can't(don't want to) touch."array.c" represents  
>> my project dependent code. If you runarrtest it will show to you,

More information about the U-Boot mailing list