[U-Boot-Users] AT91 and u-boot tests

[Wolfgang Denk]

In message <INT1OH$017AB14E924A133A473F2895B505ED00 at libero.it> you wrote:
>
> what is the difference between these command sequence to generate u-boot using 1.1.2 and 1.1.3 without doing any further setting?

The code and the default settings have changed.

> # make at91rm9200dk_config
> # make
> Should be the exactly the same

No.

> A quick watch to lowlevel_init.S shows that something low level is done here too ;> -)
> However CONFIG_SKIP_LOWLEVEL_INIT and/or CONFIG_SKIP_RELOCATE_UBOOT are not set as default for at91-dk,
> so why version 1.1.3 (and only this version) doesn't run in ram?

Because it is not configured for that.

> P.S. Manual read ;-)
> http://www.denx.de/twi> ki/bin/view/DULG/CanUBootBeConfiguredSuchThatItCanBeStartedInRAM

But it seems you ignore the message?


I give up here. Bye.

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
I have a theory that it's impossible to prove anything, but  I  can't
prove it.