[U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.

Wolfgang Denk wd at denx.de
Tue Dec 5 06:32:21 CET 2006

In message <45750057.3030400 at orkun.us> you wrote:
> What I am saying is that you should rename existing CONFIG_MPC8349 to 
> CONFIG_MPC834X and only on the boards that actually use 8349 define the 
> CONFIG_MPC8349 (in addition, not in lieu of). Of course other boards 
> using other member (8343, 8347) need to have their specific 
> CONFIG_MPC8343 and CONFIG_MPC8347 options defined appropriately as well 
> (again in addition to CONFIG_MPC834X). It is better to do this while the 
> number of boards is small.
> Anyway, I just pointed to the existing practice in U-Boot. In the end, 
> it's probably Wolfgang's decision as U-Boot project leader.

You said exactly what I had in mind. Just much better.


Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

Software Engineering:  Embedded and Realtime Systems,  Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Man is the best computer we can put aboard a spacecraft ...  and  the
only one that can be mass produced with unskilled labor.
                                                 -- Wernher von Braun

More information about the U-Boot mailing list