[U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.
wd at denx.de
Tue Dec 5 06:32:21 CET 2006
In message <45750057.3030400 at orkun.us> you wrote:
> What I am saying is that you should rename existing CONFIG_MPC8349 to
> CONFIG_MPC834X and only on the boards that actually use 8349 define the
> CONFIG_MPC8349 (in addition, not in lieu of). Of course other boards
> using other member (8343, 8347) need to have their specific
> CONFIG_MPC8343 and CONFIG_MPC8347 options defined appropriately as well
> (again in addition to CONFIG_MPC834X). It is better to do this while the
> number of boards is small.
> Anyway, I just pointed to the existing practice in U-Boot. In the end,
> it's probably Wolfgang's decision as U-Boot project leader.
You said exactly what I had in mind. Just much better.
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
Man is the best computer we can put aboard a spacecraft ... and the
only one that can be mass produced with unskilled labor.
-- Wernher von Braun
More information about the U-Boot