[U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.
wd at denx.de
Tue Dec 5 16:35:13 CET 2006
In message <F245C92A-F4A7-40AF-A73B-EB453262CB55 at kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
> Ok, but I think the several of the boards are capable of running with
> all flavors of MPC834x what do we do for them? I know the MDS is and
> I'm questing TQM834x is as well?
I think so, but I cannot answer the before I've seen what TQ does on
the TQM8347 :-(
> I understand the desire, I just feel that it doesn't add anything
> because we've done a decent job of making the differences between
> them covered by feature configs.
As Tolunay explained: it's for consistency with existing boards. And
I really think it does not hurt ao much to have both CONFIG_MPC834X
and CONFIG_MPC8349 in the board config file if this is a 8349 only
board, even if CONFIG_MPC8349 should never be used anywhere in the
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
The universe does not have laws - it has habits, and habits can be
More information about the U-Boot