[U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.

[Timur Tabi]

Tolunay Orkun wrote:

> What I am saying is that you should rename existing CONFIG_MPC8349 to 
> CONFIG_MPC834X and only on the boards that actually use 8349 define the 
> CONFIG_MPC8349 (in addition, not in lieu of). 

I agree with Kumar.  We should not defined CONFIG_MPC8349 anywhere until we know 
we need it.  Technically speaking, with the possible exception of errata, there 
should never be a need for CONFIG_MPC8349.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale