[U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.
timur at freescale.com
Tue Dec 5 17:36:35 CET 2006
Tolunay Orkun wrote:
> What I am saying is that you should rename existing CONFIG_MPC8349 to
> CONFIG_MPC834X and only on the boards that actually use 8349 define the
> CONFIG_MPC8349 (in addition, not in lieu of).
I agree with Kumar. We should not defined CONFIG_MPC8349 anywhere until we know
we need it. Technically speaking, with the possible exception of errata, there
should never be a need for CONFIG_MPC8349.
Linux Kernel Developer @ Freescale
More information about the U-Boot