[U-Boot-Users] Breakage of board ports on new features.
wd at denx.de
Tue Dec 5 17:57:11 CET 2006
In message <14A6A69F-9B58-42AB-985A-89F70DEB05A6 at kernel.crashing.org> you wrote:
> Are you ok with having CONFIG_MPC8349 set in tqm834x.h?
> So how should we set this for TQM834x? Clearly MPC8349EMDS shouldn't
> have it set, and MPC8349ITX should by your current description.
TQM834x in it's current state should set CONFIG_MPC8349 as it was
implemented and tested with MPC8349 only in mind.
> Also, let me ask, what exactly does CONFIG_MPC8349 mean? Does it
It means that the board has a MPC8349 CPU mounted.
> Personally, I feel that defining it before it's clear there is a user
> that needs it lends the define to be incorrectly used in the future.
For example, I use it for looking for boards with a specific CPU on
it (by grepping in include/configs/ :-)
Software Engineering: Embedded and Realtime Systems, Embedded Linux
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
You have nice graphics, sound and animations when the system crashes.
More information about the U-Boot