[U-Boot-Users] Re: Redundant environment
listmember at orkun.us
Fri May 5 18:45:33 CEST 2006
Tolunay Orkun wrote:
>> I am aware that some people interpreted the term "redundand environ-
>> ment" that two identical copies of the environment were stored. This
>> was obviously an unlucky choice of the name for this feature. Please
>> let's exclude this "I expected to see this, now change the code to
>> match my expectations" aspect for a moment. However, I still fail to
>> see any improvements in the suggested change; actually I only see
>> disadvantages like doubling the number of flash erase cycles for the
>> environment sectors.
> I understand you concern. In our application the environment would not
> be updated occasionally so that is not a big concern for us.
I meant to say the environment would be updated occasionally but somehow
inverted the meaning.
More information about the U-Boot