[U-Boot-Users] CHANGELOG w/ status update: cmd_of.c, ft_build.c, vsprintf.c, long long print problem

[Jerry Van Baren]

Wolfgang Denk wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> in message <452F9380.3010505 at smiths-aerospace.com> you wrote:
>> I'm sure other people use it, I read it for entertainment occasionally. 
> 
> :-) Welcome #2!
> 
>>   For instance, it is useful to sort the local commit noise from the 
>> "official" noise, following what is going on in the main tree.
> 
> Indeed. We will lose this filtering when using a  git  log  generated
> file.
> 
>>> Is this acceptable to you and everybody else?
>> You bet!
> 
> Just for the record: I have a few very busy days in front  of  me.  I
> miught  be  able to do the first steps on Sunday evening / night, but
> then I'll probably not be able to do anything again before Wednesday.
> So please be patient, if I don't reply immediately this does not mean
> I ignore any messages.

Yes, I understand.  Actually, the exclamation marks in my original reply 
were for joy that it was happening so soon, I was afraid I would be in 
limbo for a lot longer.

>> My git repository:
>> <http://www.cideas.us/git>
>>
>> Project for this discussion:
>> <http://www.cideas.us/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot/u-boot-pq2fads.git;a=summary>
>>
>> cmd_of.c, ft_build.c
> 
> I understand this might need to be cleaned up after we  merged  Jon's
> and  Matthew's  trees, so I will wait until then, OK? Will you please
> trigger me again then?

Yes, that was just for reference in case someone wanted to browse my 
changes.  I'll submit a proper patch when Jon's stuff is in the main 
repo and I can do a clean patch that doesn't conflict with Jon's work 
(including clean CHANGELOG type comments ;-).

>> vsprintf.c, long long print problem
> ...
>> I have *NOT* been able to figure out why long long printing is *NOT* 
>> working correctly.  It does *NOT* work correctly for the "%q" version 
>> either.  My current theory is that varargs isn't working correctly for 
>> long long, but I have not chased down that path (yet).
> 
> Did you check the assembler code? Which exact toolchain are you using?

a) No.  I'll do that.
b) ELDK4.0 with the 82xx PowerPC target.

> Best regards,
> 
> Wolfgang Denk

Thanks,
gvb