[U-Boot-Users] Testing todays u-boot-fdt
Wolfgang Denk
wd at denx.de
Sat Apr 21 01:01:42 CEST 2007
In message <4629358C.5050401 at cideas.com> you wrote:
>
> ...and there's the irony. With it as a library included by BOARDLIBS in
> the board config file, it is only compiled if it is called for in the
> board's config.mk.
Yes, I am aware of this.
> It seems like it would be overall a win to have more of a real library
> approach. I have not gone down that path hardly at all, however, and it
> is likely to have briers that I'm not aware of. It also would take
> time. :-/
But "more of a real library approach" still means that you *always*
build the library, but some mechanism selects which files get
compiled and archived in the libs.
> Having said that, I don't have any real issue in applying wg's patch.
> It isn't a big deal and will match the rest of u-boot methodology. At
> the end of the day, it is a lot easier than converting everything to
> true libraries. ;-]
Right :-(
Best regards,
Wolfgang Denk
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, HRB 165235 Munich, CEO: Wolfgang Denk
Office: Kirchenstr. 5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: wd at denx.de
In C we had to code our own bugs, in C++ we can inherit them.
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list