[U-Boot-Users] Question about CONFIG_MPC83XX

[Bruce_Leonard at selinc.com]

> > > to the 834x processors as well.  So my questions is two fold: 1) why 

> > > doesn't the MPC8349ITX board define CONFIG_MPC83XX to pick it up, 
and 2) 
> 
> it should, but Linux works without it because the ITX only went into
> ARCH=powerpc kernels which get the immr from device tree.

That makes sense then.  Thanks.  I have discovered that somehow (still 
working on the how :)  ), there's a -DCONFIG_MPC83XX on the command line 
to gcc.  So in reality it was being defined, just not in my board config 
file.

> 
> > > should I be doing so for an MPC8347E processor?
> 

I thought so, thanks again for the feedback.

Bruce