[U-Boot-Users] Can we drop I386 specific hack from do_bootm()?

[Bartlomiej Sieka]

Bartlomiej Sieka wrote:
[...]
> While working on adapting do_bootm() to new uImage format, I've came 
> across this I386-specific hack:
[...]
> How about dropping this hack altogether? This would make the code
> cleaner, but would require I386 targets (sc520_cdp, sc520_spunk) to use
> kernels in uImage format.
> 
> What do people think? What is the opinion of the maintainer of the 
> affected platforms (Daniel Engström, copied)?

Just a quick update: Daniel's email address given in MAINTAINERS is no
longer actual, so he's not likely to voice his opinion... Anybody else
would like to comment?

Regards,
Bartlomiej