[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix relocation problem with "new"get_dev() function

[TXEMA LOPEZ]

Hi Grant,
I don´t know if your approach is a better solution if your final intention is to clean up the code from the C files of U-Boot where the relocation is done manually. I think this would be the final goal, so, if the BROKEN or FIXED defines are provisional and only for test proposes I think both are equally valid.

Regards,
Txema.
 -----Mensaje original-----
De: 	u-boot-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net [mailto:u-boot-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net]  En nombre de Grant Likely
Enviado el:	miércoles, 21 de febrero de 2007 18:01
Para:	Stefan Roese
CC:	U-Boot-Users
Asunto:	Re: [U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] Fix relocation problem with "new"get_dev() function

At first glance this looks like a bad idea because it means every
board config file must be touched; but every config file needs to be
touched regardless.  Either:
a) touch every config file now (by adding the "IT'S BROKEN" define; or
b) touch every config file later (by removing the "IT'S FIXED" define
when all board ports are working and the hooks are no longer needed).

Thoughts?
g.

-- 
Grant Likely, B.Sc. P.Eng.
Secret Lab Technologies Ltd.
grant.likely at secretlab.ca
(403) 399-0195

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
U-Boot-Users mailing list
U-Boot-Users at lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/u-boot-users