[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH 6/17] Reorganize and fix problems (returns) in the bootm command.
Jerry Van Baren
gvb.uboot at gmail.com
Thu Jul 5 12:54:08 CEST 2007
Grant Likely wrote:
> On 7/4/07, Jerry Van Baren <gvb.uboot at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Do *NOT* return after the "point of no return" has been passed.
>> If something goes wrong, the board must be reset after that point.
>> Move the "Transferring control to Linux" debug message back to where it
>> belongs: just before transferring control to linux.
>
> Why is it necessary to reset the board at this point? The failure
> paths here seem to be things like invalid checksums and the like. Why
> are these tests after a point of no return?
>
> I would think that if any of these failures are hit, you would *not*
> want to reset the board so you can figure out what was going on.
>
> Cheers,
> g.
We've smashed our underpinnings by uncompressing linux over our
interrupt vectors before the checksum catches the problem. There is no
way back other than a reset. The error I fixed (in a couple of places)
was returns. FWIIW, my experience with the erroneous returns is that it
sort of works, but not right and then funky stuff happens. :-/
I presume the comment was a general one. If you have any specific reset
vs. return questions, hollar and I'll justify them or eat crow.
Thanks,
gvb
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list