[U-Boot-Users] Imminent u-boot-fdt pull request
Kim Phillips
kim.phillips at freescale.com
Fri May 25 17:58:33 CEST 2007
On Fri, 25 May 2007 11:27:47 +0200
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg at grandegger.com> wrote:
> Kim Phillips wrote:
> > On Tue, 22 May 2007 00:06:06 -0400
> > Jerry Van Baren <gvb.uboot at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Dear all,
> >>
> >> Please review the u-boot-fdt changes. I intend to request Wolfgang pull
> >> the pending changes soon. All of the changes (except the last trivial
> >
> > I have properties being placed at the wrong level, timebase- and
> > bus-frequencies not being updated, there are multiple copies of the
> > code, and, it is hard to read - I saw a line length of 139!
>
> Could you be more specific, please? Preferably by adding comments to the
sorry, my comments were not specific, it's because the nature of the
problem as I see it is general, and I decided to send a quick note to
save Wolfgang from them ;)
> patch. And are these problems related to the patch?
>
This is current top-of-fdt-tree behaviour:
=> fdt addr $fdtaddr
=> fdt chosen
=> fdt print /cpus
cpus {
clock-frequency=<1f78a400>; // should be one level down
#address-cells=<00000001>;
#size-cells=<00000000>;
PowerPC,8360 at 0 {
device_type="cpu";
reg=<00000000>;
d-cache-line-size=<00000020>;
i-cache-line-size=<00000020>;
d-cache-size=<00008000>;
i-cache-size=<00008000>;
timebase-frequency=<00000000>; // not updated
bus-frequency=<00000000>; // not updated
clock-frequency=<00000000>; // not updated, see above
32-bit;
};
};
I wouldn't call this quality material.
I'll post (specific) patches once I get a kernel booting, unless someone
beats me to it.
Kim
More information about the U-Boot
mailing list