[U-Boot-Users] [PATCH] fdt: add common memory fixup function

Kumar Gala galak at kernel.crashing.org
Tue Nov 27 18:16:50 CET 2007


On Nov 27, 2007, at 10:39 AM, Kim Phillips wrote:

> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 08:13:07 -0600
> Kumar Gala <galak at kernel.crashing.org> wrote:
>
>>>> Was thinking about this some more and realized I don't like
>>>> fdt_memory() getting called via bootm w/o the board code have
>>>> control.
>>>>
>>>> I think Kim suggest we have a CONFIG_OF_MEMORY_FIXUP that this call
>>>> is
>>>> wrapped around.  But leave fdt_memory() available.  I want it such
>>>> that the board code/config is in control of what fixups gets called
>>>> for it.
>>>
>>> That's funny. My first patch wrapped the fixup in
>>> CONFIG_OF_MEMORY_FIXUP
>>> and it was you, who suggested to drop this ;-). AFAIR Kim  
>>> suggested to
>>> wrap it in the existing OF_LIBFDT instead - what I did then. But I
>>> have no objections, if you put CONFIG_OF_MEMORY_FIXUP in place  
>>> again.
>>
>> Yeah, I know.  I realized later that we should leave it to board code
>> to decide what it wants in such cases.  The reason for that is if you
>> can envision having multiple device trees in multiprocessor system
>> with each processor running a different OS.
>
> so make it a weak fn then?

weak doesn't cover it.  I don't want to implement my own version of  
fdt_memory_fixup().  I want to control how its called.

- k





More information about the U-Boot mailing list