[U-Boot-Users] ARM cleanup - was: [GIT PULL] [ARM]Pleasepull fromgit://denx.de/git/u-boot-arm.git

[Ulf Samuelsson]

tis 2007-09-04 klockan 14:47 +0100 skrev Peter Pearse:
>  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: u-boot-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net 
> > [mailto:u-boot-users-bounces at lists.sourceforge.net] On Behalf 
> > Of Ulf Samuelsson
> > Sent: 04 September 2007 12:15
> > To: Peter Pearse
> > Cc: u-boot-users at lists.sourceforge.net
> > Subject: Re: [U-Boot-Users] ARM cleanup - was: [GIT PULL] 
> > [ARM]Pleasepull fromgit://denx.de/git/u-boot-arm.git
> > 
> > > 
> > > 2) Will there be two types of build for the AT91RM9200 boards
> > > a) one that runs after dataflashboot.bin (and hence must 
> > not touch the 
> > > MCU)
> > > b) one that runs direct from reset and must set up the MCU
> > >   or just one that runs after dataflashboot.bin so that I 
> > know whether 
> > > we need to ifdef the code or just delete it (for
> > > AT91RM9200)
> > 
> > The AT91RM9200DK boots from a parallel flash and should boot 
> > either directly from u-boot or from boot.bin The AT91RM9200DK 
> > is obsolete, and it is definitely not recommended to use this 
> > as an example.
> > 
> > The AT91RM9200EK can either boot from a parallel flash or 
> > from a dataflash, but can use the AT91RM9200DK board support 
> > (with a few modifications) For this, the user needs to choose 
> > in the header file if to boot from par or serial.
> 
> So I'll add a config_at91rm9200ek_config line to the Makefile && MAKEALL.
> 


The AT91RM9200EK deserves its own board, but the at45-split patch needs
to be applied first.



-- 
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson